Zook is so good at getting players into the NFL. Who cares if he doesnt win ball games. In fact I think that Illanooz lost to Minnesota last year.
This makes me cringe a little you don't think Illinois fans are not saying the same thing about Iowa?
Thats the joke.
Since an Orange bowl win for kirkster and a Rose bowl appearance by the Zookster they have been very similar.
Yet Iowa fans are very quick to point out how awful Zook is.
Ohh and for you that like to talk da money........Zookster was getting paid much less.
But the big question is.... who would you rather have as a coach, based on what they have to work with from signing day to graduation/time to go to the NFL?
Well for one I dont like the NFL. I hope kids leaving Iowa do well but I really dont give a ****. I watch a handfull of nfl games each year. I would rather have Kirk as a coach.......but my point is that so many on here that protect Kirk to no end and say he should be able to stay as long as he wants, then in the next breathe say how worthless Zook is. In the last 4 years there is not a big difference in productivity.
OoTH is making a pretty solid point. Bince I am not a guzzler of Kurt KoolAid, I am able to follow the logic path and support OoTH's argument with relative ease.
I can follow the logic too, but is it really a solid point if no one would take Zook as their coach?
Zook has won 9 games once in his career. This is at two schools with inherent recruiting advantages over Iowa.
I'd suggest involving a little more logic and a little less emotion in your thoughts.
Welp the records from the last couple years dont swing the scales, now you show me how Zook ahd recruiting advantages.
Welp the records from the last couple years dont swing the scales, now you show me how Zook ahd recruiting advantages.
Seriously? He is surrounded by a dozen or more B1G worthy players each year. Iowa has maybe 3 or 4 in a given year.