If TCU wins tonight, time to make Mountain West champ an auto BCS

BSpringsteen

Well-Known Member
The way the Mountain West has dominated, if TCU wins tonight, that conference is every bit of deserving of the BCS as any other one. Might be time to add another BCS game?
 
Weed, but what exactly does that have to do with the conversation at hand?

The winner will more than likely wind up with an at large anyway, so why lock them into an automatic and wind up with another Big East on our hands....now back to the important stuff...

What kind of weed?
 
The winner will more than likely wind up with an at large anyway, so why lock them into an automatic and wind up with another Big East on our hands....now back to the important stuff...


Agreed. This will not happen every year and the last thing the BCS needs is a 10-2 Utah team being an automatic qualifier. If teams like BYU, Utah, or TCU go undefeated or even one good loss, they will get their deserved BCS games.
 
The winner will more than likely wind up with an at large anyway, so why lock them into an automatic and wind up with another Big East on our hands....now back to the important stuff...


Agreed. This will not happen every year and the last thing the BCS needs is a 10-2 Utah team being an automatic qualifier. If teams like BYU, Utah, or TCU go undefeated or even one good loss, they will get their deserved BCS games.

Exactamundo.
 
As mentioned the winner will likely get a BCS game. I would like to see the BCS add a rule that no team will get into the title game without 3 wins over BCS conf schools and a computer SOS in the top 40 or so.

I know it never came into play this season but if Texas would hav lost TCU would have been in the discussion over a school that played a much tougher schedule.
 
As mentioned the winner will likely get a BCS game. I would like to see the BCS add a rule that no team will get into the title game without 3 wins over BCS conf schools and a computer SOS in the top 40 or so.

I would like to see the BCS stay the same as it is BUT.......wait for it, take the final 4 teams in the final ranking and then play two more games to get the National Title winner. We keep the same BCS system that will essentially be more like a playoff for teams trying to finish in the top 4, then 2 extra games (like a playoff) that will draw a couple more million for TV, schools and such. Due to the money factor, I just don't see us going away from the current BCS program even though I think it poses some issues when determining. I mean, I would love to see an undefeated AL or FL team beat up on Boise, if Boise would win in the above scenario, I would except them as the National Champion. This year however I believe highest finish is number 2 or 3 for the Broncos and we will all get to voice on a thread how they could or could not beat the team that comes away victorious from the National BCS game.
 
I don''t mind that scenario at all but as I see it one of the biggest problems is the fan travel. Realisticly I don't see the BSC going to any kind of playoff system anytime soon in large part for that very reason. I could be wrong but I don't see it. In lieu of that, since I don't think it will hapen, I think focus could go towards the regular season and what it takes to qualify for the BSC NC game.

To take that a step further, I would like to see BCS conf challenges like in B-Ball (B10 ACC challenge) Take confrences match them up in order of previous seasons finish and play home/ away games. Throw your ND's, TCU and Boise States of the world in for un even confrences. To me that would go a little ways towards strengthening schedules and answering questions early. Just another possibility.
 
Have to Chime in here. ESPN or SI.com sold TCU as the greatest team to go undefeated in 50 years. Before this game, almost no one was giving Boise State a chance against the 'speed of TCU'.

Again, those speed folks were BLASTED with foot in mouth disease. Sure Glad the I correctly picked the Boise State Broncos!
 

Latest posts

Top