How does Iowa's non-conference schedule stack up against other members of the Big Ten? I took a look and discussed logistics:
LINK
Don't kill the messenger.
Iowa's schedule is driven by money. You're simply going to get more money playing seven home games every year than playing seven one year and six on another. That's simple math.
A neutral site game could work if it makes up for losing the home game. Alabama and FSU each made $5M this year for their game. But I don't see Iowa being that kind of a draw.
Iowa is in line with the other conference teams as I laid out in this article. Big Ten teams want to seven home games annually. It's not BS. It's reality.
I wonder how much backlash there's going to be when they extend the IA/ISU series once again.
You say it is simple, but I would still like to see the numbers to back it up. It is well known that that Iowa charges different ticket prices based on the level of opponent. It is also known that tv is willing to pay more for a P5 vs. P5 game than a P5 vs. FCS game. So let's see the numbers.
If the money were better playing a Power 5, why wouldn't everybody else do it? It's not like Iowa is out on the island here. I'm not seeing a conspiracy.
Oh, for crying out loud. Do your job as a reporter and go out and get some real facts. You must have some sources you can talk to.
Are you really that disconnected from reality?Oh, for crying out loud. Do your job as a reporter and go out and get some real facts. You must have some sources you can talk to.
I tend to agree and who are we kidding the Big Ten Network and TV deals make all these institutions very wealthy. If we got a good P5 TV game that would offset the UNI deal. We kick back somewhere between 350k-400k in a payback to UNI or other FCS team anyway so you lose that part of the gate anyway. CAn't believe there's as much financial incentive as JM stated...Like you said let's see the numbers. I'd just prefer them to say we need to keep scheduling FCS schools because that's the only way FCS can stay in business.You say it is simple, but I would still like to see the numbers to back it up. It is well known that that Iowa charges different ticket prices based on the level of opponent. It is also known that tv is willing to pay more for a P5 vs. P5 game than a P5 vs. FCS game. So let's see the numbers.
You say it is simple, but I would still like to see the numbers to back it up. It is well known that that Iowa charges different ticket prices based on the level of opponent. It is also known that tv is willing to pay more for a P5 vs. P5 game than a P5 vs. FCS game. So let's see the numbers.