HN: Is Preseason Top 10 Too High, Too Fast, for 2010 Season?

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
Top 10 For Iowa in 2010; Too High, Too Soon? | Hawkeye Nation

One of my favorite days in the college football calendar is when Phil Steele’s preseason magazine hits the newsstands. Phil mails some complimentary copies to me at the radio station, so I could wait a few days and get one for free. But the second I find out his magazines have hit the shelves, I am in the car and I go plunk down the $8.00 or so bucks so that I can get one right away. Sure, that is instant gratification, but it’s SOOOOO gratifying.

Steele has his own style and flair and while a decent portion of his magazine is him telling you what he thought your team would do last year the year before, the year before that and the year before that, it’s a resource I turn to all season long.

Steele also offers up a few fun nuggets or opinions on his website prior to the start of the season, and he did that this week when he took his shot at predicting what the preseason Associated Press Top 10 would look like when it comes out in August. CLICK HERE FOR LINK

Steele believes, as do I, that Iowa will be ranked in the preseason Top 10; he has them pegged for #7. Here is his list:

1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Boise State
4. Oregon
5. Texas
6. TCU
7. Iowa
8. Florida
9. Nebraska
10. Virginia Tech

Steele goes on to say that the thinks the next five might look something like this:

11. Georgia Tech
12. Wicsonsin
13. Oklahoma
14. Miami
15. LSU

The last time the Hawkeyes were invited to ‘this dance’ was before the start of the 2005 season. The Hawks checked in at #11 in the AP preseason poll and #10 in the coaches poll. They moved up to 8th in both polls before losing 23-3 at Iowa State. The Hawks would go on to finish 7-5 that year, losing close games late against Northwestern and Michigan. It was a disappointing season based on preseason expectations.

But should we have seen a few things coming that year? Should we see a few things coming this year? I will talk about this topic over the course of a few stories…first, let’s go back to that 2005 season and remind ourselves of what happened.

In 2005, the Hawkeyes had to replace Matt Roth, Jonathon Babineaux, Derrick Robinson and Tyler Luebke on the defensive line. Babineaux was the leader in tackles for loss amongst BCS programs and #2 in the nation overall. We all remember the force Roth was on the outside, and D-Rob and Luebke did a great job, too. I recall Kirk Ferentz being asked the following question at media day: Would you rather replace a defensive line or linebackers? Iowa returned Abdul Hodge and Chad Greenway at the linebackers. Ferentz said something along the lines of ‘Well, since I have the linebackers still here, I guess I should say them.â€

Iowa started freshmen Mitch King and Matt Kroul at tackles along with Bryan Mattison and Ken Iwebema at ends. Iowa wound up allowing 126 rushing yards per game that year, roughly the same territory as the 2009 Iowa defense. They allowed 380-ish total yards and 20 points per game. Those are not bad figures, they just aren’t the ‘norm’ under Norm Parker. This most glaring weakness of that defense was its inability to get opponents off the field; teams converted 45% of their third down attempts against Iowa. Iowa’s offense averaged 30 points per game that year and 432 yards per game, one of the better offensive groups as far as production goes. Iowa also only turned the ball over 17 times all season, but that defense forced just 16 turnovers.

Iowa did not routinely win the battle up front, they didn’t create a lot of turnovers and they were not really remarkable in any of the primary defensive categories.

It all starts up front…that’s an age old cliche, and and Ferentz says, things are cliches because they are true.

This year for Iowa, as it heads into a season full of hope and promise coming off the highest end of season ranking since the late 1950’s and their biggest bowl win since the same decade, things are going to start and end up front on the offensive line. The defense? No worries, man. No worries.

Iowa loses four multiyear starters along the offensive line in Dace Richardson, Bryan Bulaga, Rafael Eubanks and Kyle Calloway. That is a lot for any school, and it’s a lot for Iowa. The Hawkeyes are also going to be a bit ‘undersized’ relative to where they have been in recent years, probably averaging around 285 pounds on the hoof for 2010. Emphasis on technique will be as strong as it ever has been.

The last time Iowa was this young entering a season was back in 2007. That team averaged just 126 rushing yards per game, in the same territory as the 2009 Hawkeyes. The defense allowed just 18.8 points per game, but the offense scored just 18.5 per game. Jake Christensen was sacked more times than any quarterback in the FBS that year, as Iowa allowed a total of 46. For those of you new to the game, that’s very, very bad. Some of that was on Jake, but most of it was on a very young offensive line. Jake was also a first year starter that year, where Iowa will have a third year starter in Rick Stanzi heading into this season he has a career mark of 18-4 as the #1 under center.

Iowa also has a much deeper and more experienced collection of receivers this year than they did in 2007, and the 2010 Iowa defense should be fearsome. The Hawkeyes return both kicking specialists this year, too. But the 2007 team converted just 32% of its third downs, again due to a young line and a young quarterback.

Here was the pre-camp two deep heading into August of 2007:

LT 78 Dace Richardson 6-6 305 Jr./60 Kyle Calloway 6-7 305 So.
LG 68 Andy Kuempel 6-7 295 So./74 Dan Doering 6-7 300 So.
C 52 Rafael Eubanks 6-3 285 So./58 Rob Bruggeman 6-3 287 Jr.
RG 75 Wesley Aeschliman 6-8 318 Jr./61 Travis Meade 6-2 285 So. or 63 Jul. Vandervelde 6-3 295 #Fr.
RT 71 Seth Olsen 6-5 305 Jr./ 72 * Tyler Blum 6-6 285 So. or 76 Alex Kanellis 6-4 295 Jr.

Neither Kuempel or Doering emerged at guard. Richardson would get injured, Bruggeman had a knee injury in the spring and never played, Meade saw duty as did Vandervelde, Seth Olseon was the best of the bunch, Kanellis never saw the field again due to concussions and Blum’s back injury ended a promising career before it ever got going.

None of those players at that time was as good as Riley Reiff is right now; Reiff will be an anchor at left tackle. Vandervelde has as much experience going into his senior season as any of those players listed above, and Adam Gettis has started a few games. Unless injuries decimate this year’s bunch, I would expect for them to be better than the 2007 group, but health is going to be so critical for this year’s offensive line I shudder to think about what a few injuries could mean to the 2010 Iowa season.

There will be names that have yet to make their mark in the psyches of Iowa fans who will step up and take the reigns this year. Just who those players will be will depend on spring and fall camp.

NEXT UP: A look at the resumes of the teams that Iowa will be ‘competing’ with in the polls for the early part of 2010 and the holes in their resume…everyone, or nearly everyone, has a few holes.
 
Pre-season polls are little more than "expectations" and should be treated as such. There is no game evidence to justify the rankings. One can point to returning starters and coaching history to justify the expectations, but until the games are played the ranking is just an expectation.

The real key for this Iowa football team is leadership. On offense I think Stanzi seems to inspire those around him. On defense it isn't as clear. Losing Edds and Angerer may have taken away from the leadership and left a void. Someone more knowledgeable than I may have a better evaluation of the defensive leaders.
 
Our reserve OL got alot of experience, plus we have a new wave of brutes coming on/in. Unless a rash of injuries breaks out I think we're gonna be ok. LB's is where i'm kind of hedging a little thats 2 VERY good coverage backers we are going to have to replace. Angerer and Edds helped seal wins for us in multiple games last year with int's ,its hard to reload those kind of players. I guess in the end you have to hope the younger players have learned what it takes from the seniors, and hope they work hard in the offseason to keep their team at a high level. Oh yeah, the Hawks have some of the best coaches in football teaching them the game, that doesn't hurt'em.
 
I am optimistic about next season, but until we prove we can move the ball on offense with a reconstituted O-Line, I think Top 10 may be a bit high. I definitely think we can be deserving of that, but in my mind our offensive production is a question mark at this point that is too prominent to put Iowa in the Top 10.
 
Humm, ever time Iowa has been hyped up preseason over the last 10 years it has never ended well. I think this team has the right attitude, but so much would have to go perfect for Iowa to live up to the preseason expectations. Defense should be stout. Spievey will be difficult to replace, but a dominate front 4 should make it much easier to be a member of this secondary. Edds and Anger will be missed, but I think they are the easiest positions to fill on the defense.

As noted the OL is going to have to come together, and fast. Ricky is not the most athletic guy scrambling around. As such I don't think he would be able to avoid the pressure like a Drew Tate. And as most people realize it is difficult to run if the OL is allowing penetration up front.

I think two even have a chance to live up to the expectations 2 things have to happen. The OL needs to get good quick. And Iowa must avoid injuries on the OL and DL. I think an injury to any of the 4 starters on the DL could have a serious impact on that group. When your depth on the OL is already in question, injuries could be devastating.

Even then its going to be hard for 2010 not to end in a let down.. Really when people are thinking NC even good 8 - 4 years tend to disappoint.
 
To be a Top 10 team you need to be GREAT in 2 of 3 categories (at defense, offense, and ST). Iowa should be great at defense and ST. Without a doubt, the Hawks deserve to be mentioned as a top 10 team going into the 2010 season. Every team has holes, and I'm excited with what Iowa brings to the field next season.
 
The thing about 05 is that if Schlicher hits two very makeable short fgs late vs NW and Mich, we tie for our 3rd Big Ten title in 4 years...so for all the issues that team had, it still should have won the Big Ten.
And of course if Murray hits that 22 yarder vs OSU this year, we win the Big Ten again.
Throw in the inexplicable losses in 08 to NW,MSU and Ill...and we could easily be looking at a run of 5 titles in 8 years....with another next year...I know...dreaming now,but KF put us on the cusp of a 6 titles in 9 years type of run...thanks KF!
 
In all fairness...Steele is in my opinion the most accurate editor of all of the magazines. He usually has teams pretty close to where he figures them to be. Obviously it isn't always true considering he is human but him having Iowa at #7 seems like a pretty good omen to me. His is the only magazine I will buy this year since the others were all way off base...I think SportingNews had us at 6 or 8 in the B10 last year. Steele said we were kind of like Alabama in the last magazine...pretty accurate if you ask me.

EDIT: As far as we go next year...I think we will at the very worst hit 9+ wins. I honestly think that Ferentz will fix or prevent this team from doing whatever went wrong in '05 and I can truly see us as being B10 contenders every year from this point on. Maybe I am being too optimistic but I really can see this happening.
 
Last edited:
its my observation that we have been able to overcome a lot of things, but a weak and/or inexperienced O-line isn't one of them. we fit that description as of now, but may not by the time august rolls around. i'm cautiously hopeful, but we haven't really ever done well when expected.
 
Pre-season polls are little more than "expectations" and should be treated as such. There is no game evidence to justify the rankings. One can point to returning starters and coaching history to justify the expectations, but until the games are played the ranking is just an expectation.

But the pre-season polls are crucial if you want to get in the national championship game. The pre-season polls feed the regular season polls, which feed the BCS standings. You can't play in the national championship game if you aren't highly ranked before the season starts.
 
But the pre-season polls are crucial if you want to get in the national championship game. The pre-season polls feed the regular season polls, which feed the BCS standings. You can't play in the national championship game if you aren't highly ranked before the season starts.

I could not agree more. And we have to look good doing it. Remember last year, when we came in at #19, barely beat UNI, but we did WIN, but completely fell out of the polls....?!
 
I don't think Top10 preseason is out of line. Any NC talk right now . . . eh, I'll wait to see how they play through the Penn State game.
 

Latest posts

Top