ALAMO BOWL, 1993 – Iowa loses (BIG) to California. You might wonder why this is on the list, since it comes from a 3–year low–point in the Fry era, where we didn’t even qualify for bowls twice - and this effort showed it should have been 3–for–3. And yet, this game set a new standard that has followed Iowa ever since – that of us receiving a bowl bid well beyond what our record and play of that season had deserved. Up until then, our bowl bids had fallen exactly the way they were supposed to – in fact, the 1991 Holiday Bowl was a real slap in the face for a team that was the Big 10 co-champ. But two things happened about that time. One was bowls taking greater and greater notice of how well Iowa “traveled” to almost any bowl they were selected for. The other was the beginning of the end of a strange "preferred" network of various powers-that-be that controlled and assigned all non-championship bowls in series of backroom deals. Ever since then, Iowa has gone to bowl after bowl after bowl (with the 1995 Sun Bowl being the other primary example in the Fry era, and the 2001 Alamo Bowl starting a trend that has been a signature of the KFz era) that was more than they probably should have received. Yes, this game was a joke – and Iowa, because they were, quite obviously, heavy underdogs in this game to begin with, lost more of these than they won. But this game represented something that we learned to become quite well-acquainted with in the Hayden Fry era – the setting of a new trend.