99topdawg
Well-Known Member
A lot was made about Davidson's schedule and how they didn't play many good teams, etc. That fact was certainly true and it showed that they simply hadn't played a team like Iowa and looked way over-matched.
Since January 1st, Davidson played 11 teams in the RPI top 101, going 8-3, 4 of those being against the top 50, going 2-2.
Since January 1st, Gonzaga has played 2 games against the RPI top 50, both against BYU (who lost their First Four game) and split those two games. They played 3 other games vs. the RPI top 100 (2 at home) and won all of them (2 vs. #68 St. Mary's and 1 vs. #83 Memphis).
They haven't played a team that played in the NCAA round of 64 since Dec. 13, when they beat UCLA during UCLA's 5 game losing streak.
They did beat Georgia, SMU, and St. John's early in the season (none on the road) and lost in OT at Arizona.
For a 2 seed, I'm not impressed by their schedule or their results. Maybe I'm just trying to convince myself that Iowa can pull it off, but it's a draw I'll take over any other 2 seed in the tourney.
Since January 1st, Davidson played 11 teams in the RPI top 101, going 8-3, 4 of those being against the top 50, going 2-2.
Since January 1st, Gonzaga has played 2 games against the RPI top 50, both against BYU (who lost their First Four game) and split those two games. They played 3 other games vs. the RPI top 100 (2 at home) and won all of them (2 vs. #68 St. Mary's and 1 vs. #83 Memphis).
They haven't played a team that played in the NCAA round of 64 since Dec. 13, when they beat UCLA during UCLA's 5 game losing streak.
They did beat Georgia, SMU, and St. John's early in the season (none on the road) and lost in OT at Arizona.
For a 2 seed, I'm not impressed by their schedule or their results. Maybe I'm just trying to convince myself that Iowa can pull it off, but it's a draw I'll take over any other 2 seed in the tourney.