nilekinnick
Well-Known Member
I have been around for both. Without going thru 45 years of stats most would lean towards Fry wither better O and Ferentz teams with better D.
Other than the standing TE of Fry, both wanted to establish a run. Have a mix of run and pass. But I don't see drastic changes in offensive philosophy.
QB's not meant to run in either, though some RPO in Iowa with Sullivan, Gronkowski
With Ferentz, miss Banks, Tate, Stanzi, Beathard ( always had Nate a 1/2 step lower ) . Fry had Long & Hartlieb , Rodgers in the hey day years.
Neither put many WR's into the NFL.
My own opinion, the Draw seemed to have more success with Fry. Both coaches have had some really good RB's.
Last 6 plus years being frustrating, ( Hawks not perceived as upper tier ), I lean to the QB being the biggest delta.
Other than the standing TE of Fry, both wanted to establish a run. Have a mix of run and pass. But I don't see drastic changes in offensive philosophy.
QB's not meant to run in either, though some RPO in Iowa with Sullivan, Gronkowski
With Ferentz, miss Banks, Tate, Stanzi, Beathard ( always had Nate a 1/2 step lower ) . Fry had Long & Hartlieb , Rodgers in the hey day years.
Neither put many WR's into the NFL.
My own opinion, the Draw seemed to have more success with Fry. Both coaches have had some really good RB's.
Last 6 plus years being frustrating, ( Hawks not perceived as upper tier ), I lean to the QB being the biggest delta.
