Fryowa
Administrator
Here's how the tournament would've been selected and seeded according to NET. Play-in games are bogus and don't count so I went 64 teams. In yellow are teams that won their CCGs but weren't in the top 64 NET.
Included are all conference champs per the current rules, and the rest are selected and seeded according to NET ranking (obviously some like the Hawks won the auto-bid but would've been in anyway). In the table below I have each team's NET ranking and what their seeding in the tournament would be. This would take everything out of a committee's hand and remember, fairness isn't an argument here. All criteria are equally applied to everyone. Can there be flaws in the logic? Yes. Does it matter? No.
Included are all conference champs per the current rules, and the rest are selected and seeded according to NET ranking (obviously some like the Hawks won the auto-bid but would've been in anyway). In the table below I have each team's NET ranking and what their seeding in the tournament would be. This would take everything out of a committee's hand and remember, fairness isn't an argument here. All criteria are equally applied to everyone. Can there be flaws in the logic? Yes. Does it matter? No.