Expansion Rip this apart! (Long)

BlitzBuster

Well-Known Member
OK before we get started here is something to think about. Back when the state of Iowa switched the small schools from conferences to districts alot of people said the same things about that are being said about the Big Ten expansion, can't break up rivalries that are in place, adds to much travel time or not geographically associated. As an example up here in NW Iowa the Lakes conference consisted of Spencer, Cherokee, Storm Lake, Spirit Lake, Emmetsburg, Sheldon, Sibley and Estherville. Estherville's biggest rivalry was Spirit Lake 17 miles to the West and Emmetsburg 25 miles to the south. The past 2 years being a 3A school we played neither of them in football and the only Lakes conference schools we played were Spencer and Storm Lake in district play and Sheldon and Sibley in Non-district play, the others were replaced with Sioux City Bishop Heelen ( 125 miles away) Seargent Bluff-Luton (105 miles) Maurice Orange City (85 miles) Le Mars (98 miles) and Denison- Schleswig (124 miles). I'll bet most of you out there don't remember it being any other way than it is now.
If the Big 10 does expand most everyone thinks it will raid either the Big 12 or Big East for team(s), a 1 school expansion doesn't cause many problems as far as the rest of the football world but 3 is a differnt story, also if the Pac 10 expands along with the Big 10 the college football landscape could and probably will change dramatically. For the sake of this discussion let's say both conferences expand to 14 teams. Since these 2 conferences are starting this domino effect they get there choice of teams everyone else has to react. Teams left in a conference that has been raided will be scrambling for new members for their confernce or another confernce to join. The SEC and ACC both being 12 team conferences will be able to pick and choose from the leftovers and the rest will fall together in either the Big 12 or Big East with one of them going away all together leaving 5 conferences of 14 teams that could look something like what follows possibly with new conference names:

Big 10: Iowa, Illinois, Purdue, Michigan, Michigan St., Northwestern, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio St. Penn St., Indiana, Rutgers, Missouri and Nebraska.

Pac 10: USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal., Washington, Wash. St., Oregon, Oregon St., Arizona, Arizona St., Colorado, Utah, BYU, and Boise St.

SEC: Alabama, Florida, LSU, Mississippi, Miss. St., Georgia, Auburn, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Vandy., S. Carolina, Texas, and Tex. A & M

ACC: North Carolina, NC St., Clemson, Florida St., Miami, Boston College, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, Maryland, Duke, Wake Forest, W. Virginia, and U Conn.

Big 12East: Oklahoma, Okie St., Texas Tech., Baylor, Pitt, Louisville, TCU, Kansas, Kansas St., Syracuse, ISU, Cincy, S Florida, and ???????????

Notre Dame may be forced away from their independent status to fill in the ??? marks or a Colo. St, Ball St. type school would get the call.
 
Last edited:
Interesting, but I don't see the Pac 10 taking 3 non-BCS teams. though I don't see who else they could take to get up to 14.

all I know is that they better not spit the Big 10 in some stupid way if we were to take Rutgers Nebraska and Mizz.
 
keep dreaming about those selections -1

I'm sure you can pick better ones! I just tried to keep it goegraphically close, until I got to the left overs. As far as what I am concerened it could stay the same but anyone believing that is just sticking their head in the sand like an Ostrich
 
BYU and probably Utah will NEVER be accepted into the Pac-10. The liberal universities in that conference will never ALL vote for acceptance, especially the California schools. The Mormon church went into CA last year and spent a millions of dollars to overturn the gay marriage bill and there is no way schools like Cal, Stanford, UCLA, and probably Oregon are EVER all going to vote to let BYU into the Pac-10.

Plus BYU, in the Mountain West, likes it place where it gets to run the conference. If it tried to flex its power in the Pac-10 it woud get put in its place in a big hurry and the Mormon Church does not work that way.

I DOUBT that BYU even gets invited to the Pac-10 or Utah. If you think the Mormon Church would have nothing to do with them getting invited I and many others disagree. If the Pac-10 couldn't get 10 percent agreement on Texas previously do you REALLY think they will ALL vote for the Mormon Church, which BYU is? Utah would stand a better chance than BYU and Utah doesn't stand a chance of getting in.

Just imagine the Mormon Church in the Pac-10 with Cal, Stanford, Oregon, UCLA, USC, Arizona, and so on...ALL those liberal schools. We are talking schools like Wisconsin, Iowa, and so on. Do you really think Iowa, Wisconsin, or the rest of the Big 10 schools would vote to let the Mormon Church join the Big 10? BYU doesn't even have the credentials for Stanford!
 
Top