I will contradict that Con with the view that after watching the videos of this kid I submit he helped make those recievers D1. Seldom if ever did they hesitate or have to wait on the ball.The pros: Good mechanics, great feet, quick release and a strong arm. Already used to playing with speed and has the accuracy for it.
The cons: as Jon mentioned, played with great skill position players, so didnt have to check down to th3 2nd and 3rd WR a lot. Very smart kid, though, so he should be able to pick up the offense.
When I saw his film, I couldnt believe he was a 3* QB, honestly. I dont think he has a shot in Hades of unseating Vandenberg but I expect him to start once JV is done.
The pros: Good mechanics, great feet, quick release and a strong arm. Already used to playing with speed and has the accuracy for it.
The cons: as Jon mentioned, played with great skill position players, so didnt have to check down to th3 2nd and 3rd WR a lot. Very smart kid, though, so he should be able to pick up the offense.
When I saw his film, I couldnt believe he was a 3* QB, honestly. I dont think he has a shot in Hades of unseating Vandenberg but I expect him to start once JV is done.
As far as comparisons go, here is the #1 QB prospects' video. Jake Driscoll ....
Look at this kids passing skills. Give me your opinion, please
I counted 7 jump balls that he threw, any of which could have been picked off. And would be picked off in college football.
Driskel gets the attention he does because he has better arm-strength AND because of his impressive athleticism. He has pretty impressive mobility for a guy who is more of a pocket passer. He also passes on the run pretty well.
However, that said, I agree that Driskel's ranking seems to be due more to his potential and measurables than it does to what you see on film. Of course, that said, his ability to make plays out of nowhere is a positive attribute.
Rudock has impressive touch and accuracy ... however, we're going to have to see how the rest of his game develops.
Look at this kids passing skills. Give me your opinion, please
That Driscoll kid has a really strong arm...he underthrew a couple, but I think some of the scrambling he did allowed his receivers to outrun his arm, but he threw a couple of lasers from on a dead run over 50 yards. Heck, the very first throw on the video he zinged it about 40 yards without really even breaking stride and seemed to be all arm.
Look at the throw at the :35 second mark...that's a throw that is 42 yards vertically and about 34 yards horizontally (HS hashes divide the field into thirds, IIRC). Pythagorean fans, am I doing this right? 42^2 * 34^2 = ~54 yard throw. That's with poor form (weight transfer was minimal and balance was off)...so color me impressed with the arm strength.
Don't really think the Pythagorean theorem works that way.
Hmm...I thought it worked like this:
A squared x B squared = C squared
Vertical distance x horizontal distance = Total throw distance (hypotenuse)
But it has been a while...
Yeah that's the P.Theorem but that doesn't really apply to throwing a football. The flight of a football isn't a right triangle.
I'm not trying to calculate the flight...I'm just trying to see how far he threw the ball because the kid has a good arm. If he thrown that ball straight down the field, with no sideways variation, it would have gone ~54 yards. Since he threw it diagonally, down the field 42 yards and towards the sideline 34 yards, calculating the hypotenuse gives me the distance the ball traveled in yards. That's all I was going for.