Another McQueary Story Version

I'm not sure if this guy is an idiot or just a moron. He sure is trying his best to hurt the case against Sandusky.
 
I think the only defense Penn St admin (including Paterno) would have it....is that they knew absolutely nothing about what was going on. .And that...is very unlikely.

Everytime I read one of these stories with an "account" of what happened, I get sick to my stomach all over again. How could these bastards just look the other way.
 
Last edited:
ILHawkeye said:
I'm not sure if this guy is an idiot or just a moron. He sure is trying his best to hurt the case against Sandusky.
Click to expand...

Hopefully they have complied/continue to compile enough evidence to convict Sandusky with or without Mr. McQ's testimony.
 
So what version is the actual truth?
I think there will probably be more than enough to go after Sandusky without MM testimony.

The question that I have is, did he tell the truth at the Grand Jury?

Also, was Paterno wrongfully dismissed?

It seems that with every scenario that Paterno should have known what was going on or was told what was going on there is a new twist...

I am not defending anyone in this case, the fact is there are a ton of accusers and it would be surprising if there weren't multiple victims as well.

I don't know if the truth about what Paterno knew or didn't know will ever come out, but if everything on his firing hinged on McQueary, PSU may have listened to the wrong guy...when is the next version of his story going to come out?

Very, very sad story no matter how it turns out.
 
hawkdrummer1 said:
I think the only defense Penn St admin (including Paterno) would have it....is that they knew absolutely nothing about what was going on. .And that...is very unlikely.

Everytime I read one of these stories with an "account" of what happened, I get sick to my stomach all over again. How could these bastards just look the other way.
Click to expand...

It is a sickening story, but what if they really didn't know?

I agree that it would be very unlikely, but it is possible.
 
sportstalent said:
So what version is the actual truth?
I think there will probably be more than enough to go after Sandusky without MM testimony.

The question that I have is, did he tell the truth at the Grand Jury?

Also, was Paterno wrongfully dismissed?

It seems that with every scenario that Paterno should have known what was going on or was told what was going on there is a new twist...

I am not defending anyone in this case, the fact is there are a ton of accusers and it would be surprising if there weren't multiple victims as well.

I don't know if the truth about what Paterno knew or didn't know will ever come out, but if everything on his firing hinged on McQueary, PSU may have listened to the wrong guy...when is the next version of his story going to come out?

Very, very sad story no matter how it turns out.
Click to expand...

how would this play out if, in fact, Sandusky was innocent?
 
imported_ankle23 said:
how would this play out if, in fact, Sandusky was innocent?
Click to expand...

That's a giant if, but going with that premise, every single one of those board members would need to resign.


I am starting to wonder about the reliability of McQueary's testimony. I don't have much doubt that Sandusky is child molester but I have a ton of doubt on what exactly McQueary did and told others immediately following discovering Sandusky.
 
It might be wise to actually see what this guy testified to instead of reading about it from some "source". When the hell did this other guy surface anyway? First I have heard of this Dr that was at his Dad's house. From what I have read McQueary has testified to telling his Dad, Paterno, and everyone else the same story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top