I agree that the best fit for the SEC is OK. The SEC is at 12 right now,I believe. So adding both OK and A & M would make sense. Of course Texas is the big kahuna ,but I agree that the Horns are never going to the SEC.
It would be huge to tear OK away from OK St, and A & M away from Texas...that is a big leap. But, like with Iowa-ISU, it would set up an annual non-conference game of national interest for all four schools. Of course, OK-Texas might also have to remain,which makes a tough non-conf schedule for Texas...A& M and OK? in the non-conference? whoa. Could impact their national title hopes.
I think as the reality of adding a school draws near, these conferences get a little hinky considering...does the addition actually enhance our brand? Penn St. and Neb. enhance the Big Ten brand...so would ND....and Texas...that is about it for the Big Ten. Now, the SEC does not have the bar set as high,so OK and A& M would enhance their brands,but A & M has to think about their academic reputation.
As for the Pac Ten /Big 12 shotgun wedding? I am not buying this is a no-brainer enhancement for the Big 12 and Texas. The Pac Ten tv ratings will never be good out east where the people are due to the time zone deal. I think Texas will hesitate and take one long last look at retaining the core of the Big 12 and maintaining their big dog status. Hell, ISU and the Kansas schools would let Texas form their own network ,take 90% of tv revenue and offer up their wives and daughters to Texas right now,if they keep it together. Texas might just do that.