" Instead, we would want to identify 30 or 40 teams that command the biggest audience. That may be by reputation or location, but generally we all know that there are members in every one of these conferences that frankly don’t move the needle."
I have been wondering if conferences would be restructured with those top teams only. The article goes on to say this...
But these teams are unlikely to be willing to play a 12 team schedule against each other; meaning there will still be a need for teams like Washington State, Wake Forest, Kansas State, Boise, Purdue, Iowa State, Vandy, Baylor, Georgia Tech and Northwestern. (glad they didn't say IOWA here)
These secondary level teams may not command the same dollars as the Top 35 or 40, but they will serve some purpose, perhaps a cannon fodder, or maybe as an occasional spoiler that will pop up in any given year. But the *Big Dogs will still need a few cupcakes to get fat on, and this alone is the ONLY value a conference affiliation could offer.
Will the big dogs want to share the revenue ?