17.877%: more fun with useless, but also telling numbers

dagdaj

Well-Known Member
Cause I like numbers. Even if they are nonsense. And then trying to give them legitimate value.

17.877%
That's the percentage of Iowa's total points that were recorded by defensive players (including PATs as a 'gimmee').
4 tds
2 safeties

32 out of 179 points.

Caveat: It's actually a little hard to find safeties/per team quickly on the Googlebox, so I'm only counting them for Iowa, cause I know them. Also, they wouldn't make much of a difference.

There's a bundle of Big 10 teams at around 5%. Rutgers, Wisconsin, Purdue.
Michigan and OSU are 3% and 2%.
All 5 of them have 2 defensive TDs.

Illinois, Indiana each have 1 defensive TD.
They're percentages are ~2-3%

Western Kentucky (top scoring defense) has 6 defensive touchdowns. Yet, that still accounts for just ~10% of their total points.
Found a few other somewhat relevant teams (Cincy, Pitt) who were close to 10%.

It would take eons to figure out how many points came from take-aways leading to a red-zone possession. Which makes the data above somewhat meaningless.
But no the less "telling".

In my estimation, this is the most complete defense ever for the Hawkeyes. There is not one hole on this defense that is either subjective or objectively measurable. There is no weakness. At least not one that someone has figured out how to exploit. AND, they score points. Doesn't mean they're infallible. Just invaluable.

Certainly, Iowa has never ever had a defense more important than this year's defense. That's where these numbers can start to appear to have legitimate value. I doubt there are very many NCAAf teams in the contemporary era with winning records where the percent of points scored by the defense is near 20%.
 
Cause I like numbers. Even if they are nonsense. And then trying to give them legitimate value.

17.877%
That's the percentage of Iowa's total points that were recorded by defensive players (including PATs as a 'gimmee').
4 tds
2 safeties

32 out of 179 points.

Caveat: It's actually a little hard to find safeties/per team quickly on the Googlebox, so I'm only counting them for Iowa, cause I know them. Also, they wouldn't make much of a difference.

There's a bundle of Big 10 teams at around 5%. Rutgers, Wisconsin, Purdue.
Michigan and OSU are 3% and 2%.
All 5 of them have 2 defensive TDs.

Illinois, Indiana each have 1 defensive TD.
They're percentages are ~2-3%

Western Kentucky (top scoring defense) has 6 defensive touchdowns. Yet, that still accounts for just ~10% of their total points.
Found a few other somewhat relevant teams (Cincy, Pitt) who were close to 10%.

It would take eons to figure out how many points came from take-aways leading to a red-zone possession. Which makes the data above somewhat meaningless.
But no the less "telling".

In my estimation, this is the most complete defense ever for the Hawkeyes. There is not one hole on this defense that is either subjective or objectively measurable. There is no weakness. At least not one that someone has figured out how to exploit. AND, they score points. Doesn't mean they're infallible. Just invaluable.

Certainly, Iowa has never ever had a defense more important than this year's defense. That's where these numbers can start to appear to have legitimate value. I doubt there are very many NCAAf teams in the contemporary era with winning records where the percent of points scored by the defense is near 20%.
It's the denominator that is the anomaly / problem.
 
I don't have time to figure it up but the largest improvement in these past 3 games is few amount of points the offense has given up. I'm talking pick 6's and turnovers on our own side of the field that lead to easy points for the other team. I lost count in the Ohio State game, I had a tally going in the game thread and I either lost interest or forgot how to count that high.
 
What about the points generated by the offense when they started with in field goal range (say 30 yard line in)? Curious to see what that stat would add
 
Other useless numbers - Cal fired their OC today.

Cal is ranked 88th in total offense, has scored 13 more offensive touchdowns than Iowa and averages 100+ more yards of total offense per game than Iowa.

If we had that offensive output we'd be 8-2. BF is so far below what's acceptable it's just pathetic.
 
Cause I like numbers. Even if they are nonsense. And then trying to give them legitimate value.

17.877%
That's the percentage of Iowa's total points that were recorded by defensive players (including PATs as a 'gimmee').
4 tds
2 safeties

32 out of 179 points.

Caveat: It's actually a little hard to find safeties/per team quickly on the Googlebox, so I'm only counting them for Iowa, cause I know them. Also, they wouldn't make much of a difference.

There's a bundle of Big 10 teams at around 5%. Rutgers, Wisconsin, Purdue.
Michigan and OSU are 3% and 2%.
All 5 of them have 2 defensive TDs.

Illinois, Indiana each have 1 defensive TD.
They're percentages are ~2-3%

Western Kentucky (top scoring defense) has 6 defensive touchdowns. Yet, that still accounts for just ~10% of their total points.
Found a few other somewhat relevant teams (Cincy, Pitt) who were close to 10%.

It would take eons to figure out how many points came from take-aways leading to a red-zone possession. Which makes the data above somewhat meaningless.
But no the less "telling".

In my estimation, this is the most complete defense ever for the Hawkeyes. There is not one hole on this defense that is either subjective or objectively measurable. There is no weakness. At least not one that someone has figured out how to exploit. AND, they score points. Doesn't mean they're infallible. Just invaluable.

Certainly, Iowa has never ever had a defense more important than this year's defense. That's where these numbers can start to appear to have legitimate value. I doubt there are very many NCAAf teams in the contemporary era with winning records where the percent of points scored by the defense is near 20%.
What is shows is how bad the O is. Maybe a bit that the D isn't so unique, but still darn good.
 
Top