I am glad that they got to sit home and stew over how they lost the ISU game.
It's not just the horrible spacing, but the radically uneven competition. Teams in the teens or 200's.
I know now you can't lay down schedules exactly how you want them, but this is going a bit overboard.
This team needed to play more teams that would equate to mid or lower B10 teams in the non-con.
Agreed. A close loss that had to hurt and a lot of time to think. Hope this breeds motivation. Also a lot of practice time to work on particulars.I am glad that they got to sit home and stew over how they lost the ISU game.
True, but remember we did have six games and something like 15 extra practices. That along with only 1 newcomer. Utoff practiced last year and the rest of the squad got plenty of crunch time. I think the European trip was better competition than most of our non-con.If you think about it, the only decent games they had scheduled, they didn't really have much to do with scheduling. Xavier, Villanova were tourney games, ND was ACC/B10 challenge and the Iowa schools is a state thing.
The biggest issue is that the starters just didn't get a chance to play enough in crunch time.
If you think about it, the only decent games they had scheduled, they didn't really have much to do with scheduling. Xavier, Villanova were tourney games, ND was ACC/B10 challenge and the Iowa schools is a state thing.
The biggest issue is that the starters just didn't get a chance to play enough in crunch time.
You are incorrect. Where do you get this stuff? We opted out of another tournament to get in the better tournament with Xavier, Villanova, UTEP, Kansas, etc. Iowa had EVERYTHING to do with scheduling those games. We know we're going to play an ACC team and Iowa State and either UNI or Drake every year.
Is every non conference game supposed to be a potential loss? We have to have some breathers. It gives us a chance to bring along new players and work on weaknesses which are exposed when we play the tougher teams.
There are no breathers in conference so we best take them when we can get them. The next game is Nebraska...currently 90 on Kenpom.
Sorry, but you don't "schedule" tournament games, the tournament organizers schedule the games. You accept an invitation. Scheduling games means ADs calling ADs.
And no, every game shouldn't be a loss or an automatic victory. That is my point. Just way too much feast or famine in the non-con.
And Nebby is indicative of exactly the type of team I am thinking would have been helpful for Iowa to schedule in the non-con - likely win, but not a cake walk. There are about 150 teams Iowa could have chose from that would have been within that range. Just surprising that they couldn't find one or two to replace a couple of the games in which the starters were not in the game any where near the end of the second half.
Sorry, but you don't "schedule" tournament games, the tournament organizers schedule the games. You accept an invitation. Scheduling games means ADs calling ADs.
And no, every game shouldn't be a loss or an automatic victory. That is my point. Just way too much feast or famine in the non-con.
And Nebby is indicative of exactly the type of team I am thinking would have been helpful for Iowa to schedule in the non-con - likely win, but not a cake walk. There are about 150 teams Iowa could have chose from that would have been within that range. Just surprising that they couldn't find one or two to replace a couple of the games in which the starters were not in the game any where near the end of the second half.