Search results

I don't consider myself as vocal as most, but this is one my two main gripes with Kirk. If players are even remotely close in practice, doesn't it make sense to replace the starter in a game if they screw up? The competition makes everyone better. Gair should have had steady reps from game...

So honest question here, why would Gair be an either/or? It could be argued that the defense is actually functional since he stepped on the field. Not trying to be a coach basher, but if he's clearly as good if not better than Taylor, why didn't he see the field when Taylor kept missing...