Search results

I love the gold jerseys, the basketball ones are better though. I also like McDonald's.

The others he was recruiting committed elsewhere.

Twitter mostly sucks, it's designed for stupid interactions like this. Anything good on twitter gets posted on a forum anyway so there's really no point in being on there. Dumb for both sides but he's not the first and won't be the last.

Kansas has 5 wins against ranked teams, one road and one neutral, and played the toughest schedule with a young team that struggled early. Iowa State has beat 4 ranked teams, all at home of course. No other team in the top 25 have more than 3 wins over ranked teams. Oklahoma didn't play...

Knew he shouldn't have played so soon

Paul's too good

#undefeated

NCAA College Basketball RPI Rankings - ESPN

That guy that ejected him was punished.

This made my day

Elves gotta eat.

Ha, this comment is always comical. Kansas needed a banked in 3 at the buzzer to win at home in OT over ISU. We then lost at home (even though it was a screwjob) and on a neutral court in the Big 12 tournament.

I'll agree with most of this. There are good players outside the top 150 and a few bad ones in it, but I'm not sold on 1 ranked player a year to be an elite team. A great team maybe, but elite teams that are in the top 25 on a consistent basis sign more than one ranked kid a year and it...

Wisconsin gets 4th pretty much every year, which is what I was saying. One 4* recruit/performance per class is not enough to compete for championships. Burke and Oledipo were both top 150 recruits. You're just proving my point.

We had two players that had a shot at the NBA, one of them drafted 16th, and we still finished tied for 3rd two years ago and weren't even close to winning the league. That's the point I was trying to make, thanks.

You must have missed the 4* or 5* part. Wisconsin gets either a 4* or a 5* each year on average. Edit: Also, Watford was 4* and Hulls/Oladipo were both top 150.

I think it takes more than one or two studs to win conference titles. This isn't the Missouri Valley we're talking about.

I guess the question is if you want to be a consistent NCAA tournament team and generally receive votes in the polls most years or if you are satisfied with one year in the tournament and near the top 25, one year in the tourney, and two years in the NIT. The recruiting for Iowa the past couple...

I was responding to your post where you said "PERFORM like a 4*", not be a 4*. You need more than a couple players performing like 4* players to be a team competing for championships. To quote your entire statement: "I realize that getting top 100 kids increases the chances of them...

What?