Search results

The summary of your analysis is "depth". Not only is it notable that we won without Basabe and Cartwright and with McCabe and Marble, but Fran has been very good (and could become a master) at getting the player mix right. Last night, even beyond the zone, he knew that MN was game planning for...

This has got to be part of it, and I assume that there was a backroom deal years ago that got BTN on Mediacom that included such promises.

Is he going to be piped in from Ames? He's been telling us all summer that he plans on going to the Cyclone home opener. He must be assuming it will still be flooded. Good move Jon.

The emotional answer is Oregon, as any loss by USC makes Notre Dame look even worse. The logical answer is USC, as we don't need Ohio State looking any worse than it already does when we beat them. The bigger question is if we want Minnesota or Michigan State to win. Do we want the previous...

Christiansen was certainly part of it, but he didn't have tons of help, so I would say "youth". Or inexperience. If you saw all of the players playing on that MSU-Iowa replay last night that are still playing (Sandeman, Cheney, Stross, VanderVelde, Donahue, Greenwood, etc.), it would have hit you.

The reality is that it is probably Mitch Daniels, but due to his limited snaps, I would say Edds. Is now a good time to break down next year's two-deeps? I would assume Spievey and Clayborn need not be listed.