Search results

While i disagree and think Campbell will be in Ames for at least the next few years, would it be so bad to get that stepping stone coach if it meant 2-3 BIG titles in 5 years? I know stability is the goal, but it doesnt mean everything.

I would think not. No offense to Bob, but he had alot of advantages at OU.

So 4 years of 8-4 Hell get there

Sounds a lot like playing not to lose rather than playing to win. Thats the biggest problem i have the whole ball control offense. I not saying to get in a shootout everyweek, but take some risks. Dont be so afraid the other team is going to score that you're not willing to make a play.

Thats only half truth. Sure its flawed, but look at the number of 5 star recruits compared to 2 star recruits. Some will develop and make it big. Just imagine this developmental ability if we started out with great talent!

Say what you want about the guy. I wish our coach had 1/2 his passion

They score points.

20 years, hes not going to change

All he had to do was fall down...

Declined....

Dont call it a comeback... Seriously, dont

Nate doubling his pass yards on that throw

10-3? I'm pretty sure Wisconsin is going to score a couple more times

You're right, hell probably have a solid 5-6 year career as a backup.

I dont think hes regressed. He just didnt get that much better

Nice call

Youre right, that Wisky game is gonna be tough...

I just cant get myself to fully support the idea that Iowa can out Wisconsin, Wisconsin on the road. It will be close, but Wisky by 4

Kick Rutgers out, add ISU. We still get our win each year and we can schedule somebody else in non con. Really its a win all around, except the BIG would lose out on those NY folk that dont even care about cfb.

Rhule would be my guess, then possibly Fleck, then Campbell in order of probability. I may be in the minority, but i dont see Matt Campbell leaving for a while. PJ seems to have baught into MN, but i still think hes a weasel.