Search results

Could...we...possibly...win...out???

Wooohoooo

Ball game

Damn iowa gives me heartburn

Punting is winning

Iowa continues to beat themselves

71-0 consecutive losses at home

The announcers on Peacock have no audio

(Re)-Introducing the Seekers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKySE1Ukupg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP2zeZDZoOw

Insert "eliminate " for diminish

Might as well annoint O$U B2B NCs right now.

Debby looks like dogsh!t. Better think long and hard PSU

Also, on today's Dan Patrick show, they had a poll question... "What is the over/under regarding the number of years Cig will actually collect on the new contract." Four years seemed to be the popular answer.

This x 1000 Indiana is like the ugly guy who somehow gets a date with a 36DD model to the prom. He'll throw rational thinking out the window, doing everything he can so nobody else will steal her away, and ultimately ends up spending a ton of dollars....hoping it'll work out one way or...

I started following the Lakers in 1972 when they ran off the 33 game win streak. I was in 8th grade and had a Wilt poster in my room. That year, after Elgin retired, West finally got his only title. I hated and rooted against Alcindor *until* 1975 when he became a Laker. Then it was the 80s...

33 data points would certainly be statistically relevant....but if we're talking NCAA FB seasons, with the same coach/staff, 3-5 is probably a legit sample size. :) One or two seasons isn't.

If you have Netflix, watch 30 for 30: Celtics/Lakers: The Best of Enemies Three parts. It's some of the best TV I've watched. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7009262/

I read a "way too early NFL draft projection" article that had Dunker going #16 to the Rams. #16 in the 2025 draft got a four year contract worth a cool $19.3 mil.

One data point = nothing...statistically speaking. Two data points = a line, but not a statistical trend... Three data points (and beyond) = a solidifying analysis.