Search results

Have your own opinion. Others have theirs. The “rating” has been explained numerous times

First off, get over yourself. Not every reply is meant for you. Quit reading it that way. Secondly, learn to comprehend. Simply saying teams are playing 10, 9 or 8 p5’s isn’t a good comparison because the strength of schedule varies and that’s the entire point. By playing teams from 30-300...

Nfl teams have to play someone. The league does their schedule. And by the way, two weeks ago in ferentz’ weekly press conference, he said they didn’t have input into the b10 schedule, but the way he said it made it very clear, he did for non-conference so we can put that excuse behind us Also...

They can’t evaluate or recruit skill position talent. Take your nfl talent talk and stuff it because that has zero to do with the issue he’s had forever

Horrible comparison

It wasn’t called. That wasn’t what happened and not what was called

There actually was. Multiple. But it’s a stupid rule and one i’d never call unless there was a clear offensive advantage

The one

Why don’t you start with simply speaking for yourself. But you can’t do that. You are one of these guys that’s real tough on the internet.

I think it listed the teams pretty clearly that iowa resembles. It certainly isn’t the more successful ones. It’s the ones in the middle. The ones that are always around.500. The ones that don’t perform in the passing game.at is the difference between these middle of the road nfl teams and iowa...

Nfl philosophy? Huh? Not ones that win Super Bowls. They have qb’s and throw for 250 and beyond every Sunday. Two that come to mind are Tennessee, pitt and ny g-men. Successful at times but not world champions

Get over yourself buddy. There weren’t a lot of logical options. And that’s the problem with Ferentz. He wins because of the system. But we rarely upset anyone outside of an occasional “in conference” opponent that we know extremely well. The issue is primarily the absolute lack of real talent...

“Even for you”? What the hell does that mean? And I answered your question. “What could they have done”

Again. Neither of us are wrong. Just different expectations & desires.

Recruit better talent at skill positions. And have a former qb run the offense

The National

This mentality gets you beat by stanford in the rose bowl 58-0

You were the same guy that was all puffy chested heading in to play stanford…the last time we played in a real bowl game

Players on nfl rosters have little to do with team success in college…at least under ferentz. It’s one of the weird things

I’m not sure what your point is here. Playing bad teams doesn’t make you better. Recruiting, coaching, developing makes you better. Scheduling has never been about making you better. They are completely separate arguments