Search results

And according to Whitlock Iowa wouldn't have a chance against Stanford or notre dame, nevermind that Iowa beat northwestern by 30 which beat said Stanford. But somehow Iowa wouldn't have a chance. Don't try to find logic in that, you'll just make your head hurt.

Yep. Complete you know what. Whitlock opened his mouth and removed all doubt about him being a total fool.

HawkeyeNation hereby makes a motion for Jon Miller and his father to watch Iowa's remaining (three) games TOGETHER. Would anybody like to second this?

... Besides Nebraska?

Iowa had 6 days' rest between games, Nebraska 13 days. Iowa was 0% on 3rd down conversions. Nebraska had 12+ minutes of time of possession advantage (due to quick Iowa drives and inefficiency on 3rd down) and Iowa still wins by 8. Until the game is won.

If only my wife would understand this vital point.

Cough. Cough.

Armstrong will soon give King his 9th INT

I did. Tevaun Smith, I believe.

Have to credit coaches for recognizing Canzeri is the much more effective back this game and starting him the second half.

Rapemates seems more correct. (Allegedly)

Nebraska is the Oakland Raiders of college football. Dirty team, heavily penalized, and still live in their heyday of decades past.

My vote matched the coaches.

Rushing CAR YDS AVG TD LG C.Beathard 2 12 6 0 9 L.Daniels 5 2 0.4 0 3 J.Canzeri 7 29 4.1 0 12 M.Vandeberg 1 9 Which RB do you think should get more carries????

By my math, if this keeps up in the 2nd half Iowa wins 28-20.

What does Iowa have to do to get a holding call against Nebraska?

Ok. If Gerry isn't ejected, I'd mark him for retaliation if I were an Iowa player.

King gave him way too much room

I've just realized that this is indeed a rivalry game, at least for me, based on nothing more than my intense hatred for Nebraska.

Ny Times article highlighting the 10-0 start. Was on Starbucks Wi-Fi homepage here in Tennessee, which was a nice surprise...