They fill some big arenas, and most people who watch really like the game itself. I've been to a few games. My wife and I watch together.There have been only two even remotely redeeming things in the history of WNBA.
1) The dildo-gate hilarity
2) The hundreds of hours of Benny Hill soundtracked blooper reels online.
It's worse than 3rd grade rec basketball, folks...what else is there if you don't have a bunch of Days of Our Lives drama? It's literally the only thing that gets people to tune in. After Clarkmania died out they had to invent a reality show bullshit angle like they do in pro wrestling otherwise no one would pay attention.
I’ve tried to watch a few games. It’s absolutely, positively, comically terrible basketball. I watch sports on TV to see high skill level regardless of male/female. Like women’s Olympic events as a small example…yes, men would crush women in the same sports under the same conditions. That’s biology. But take for instance women’s downhill skiing—there aren’t any 15 year old boys who would come even close to beating the women at the top.They fill some big arenas, and most people who watch really like the game itself. I've been to a few games. My wife and I watch together.
I do agree that the drama is absolutely ridiculous and I wish it would stop. I really hate all of the drama and rage baiting.
![]()
131 tis. zhlédnutí · 2,3 tis. reakcí | Despite Caitlin Clark, the WNBA will lose $40 million and NBA owners are not happy | OutKick
Despite Caitlin Clark, the WNBA will lose $40 million and NBA owners are not happywww.facebook.com
Folks have suggested: Legacy low media rights revenue, high operational and travel (charter airline flights) costs relative to ticket sales, and heavy reinvestment into team infrastructure as the league scales up.Yet the WNBA is expanding from 12 to 18 teams in just a few short years. The WNBA contract wth the players has quadrupled player's salaries. Caitlin Clark is routinely selling out 18k arenas. WNBA TV viewership is setting record numbers.
I tell you, the math ain't adding up. If they are losing money, why are they now spending all this money?
Folks have suggested: Legacy low media rights revenue, high operational and travel (charter airline flights) costs relative to ticket sales, and heavy reinvestment into team infrastructure as the league scales up.
Is that the only source you have?![]()
131 tis. zhlédnutí · 2,3 tis. reakcí | Despite Caitlin Clark, the WNBA will lose $40 million and NBA owners are not happy | OutKick
Despite Caitlin Clark, the WNBA will lose $40 million and NBA owners are not happywww.facebook.com
It's obvious you've watched only a handful of WNBA games.I’ve tried to watch a few games. It’s absolutely, positively, comically terrible basketball. I watch sports on TV to see high skill level regardless of male/female. Like women’s Olympic events as a small example…yes, men would crush women in the same sports under the same conditions. That’s biology. But take for instance women’s downhill skiing—there aren’t any 15 year old boys who would come even close to beating the women at the top.
But basketball, soccer, etc…a middling high school boys team would absolutely decimate the WNBA champs and the women’s national team got beat by a random 14u team. It has nothing to do with the fact that they’re women, I wouldn’t take the time to watch 13 handicap men golfers on TV either. It’s just uninteresting.
WNBA takes it a step further because it’s a literal blooper reel. Five layups missed in a row, passing to the wrong team, 10 airballs a game, doinks off the bottom of the rim, and most of them have 8” verticals. That’s not exciting to me.
Take the rim to 9’, move the 3 point line to 18’, and you might have something exciting I’d watch because it wouldn’t be such a comedy of errors.
I’m gonna get flak for this, but have you ever seen women’s 6 on 6 basketball? It’s great. Fast paced, not clogged up with a bunch of blooper material, and I’d watch the hell out of that.
Women’s wrestling is super exciting to me because it’s one on one with no rules that make it comedic compared to the men’s version. In fact, the women wrestle freestyle in college which is by far the most exciting of the disciplines to watch.
But basketball? No way.
I get that it's offensive to some people when I criticize the WNBA, but let's be honest...it's a blooper reel. "somewhat inconsistent" is a nice, diplomatic way of characterizing what we all see to be the product. I was actually being nice by not posting the blooper footage. All of which you never see in an NBA game. The NBA might be rough, but it ain't near what the WNBA is.A more balanced and I think accurate view is that the league --and the players -- are somewhat inconsistent.
Let's also be honest here...what's the ratio of blooper reel to battles of competitive, high level talent?I watched the first game of the season between the LA Sparks and some other team, and it was an embarrassment that set the game of bball back 50 years. On the other hand, I've seen WNBA teams trade 3-pt buckets with hands in their faces back and forth, back and forth in a thrilling battle of competitive, high-level talent.
I disagree. It may be high-level vs their peers, but it's not even remotely high level among the sport as a whole. High school kids would annhilate the WNBA champs....competitive, high-level talent.
Is that the only source you have?
I've been enjoying watching Fever games. The league needs new leadership, without a doubt, and I'm not into any of the culture war nonsense taking place off the court.
But I think the quality of play is really good.
I used to watch quite a bit of the NBA, but I actually enjoy regular season games in the WNBA more. 44 regular season games at 40 minutes each is perfect (compared to 82 games at 48 minutes each). Each game means something, and players don't seem to coast until the 4th quarter (when a lot of NBA games actually start).
I'm also not into telling people they should like the WNBA or women's basketball either. I legit enjoy watching it, and even text among my Hawkeye guy friends during games, too. I enjoy the Fever because of Caitlin, but also because I know the roster now and find their high scoring run and gun style fun to watch. But I also like watching them go against teams with other young stars who have come into the league the last few years. It's good, intense competition.
The officiating is another matter...
It's obvious you've watched only a handful of WNBA games.
A more balanced and I think accurate view is that the league --and the players -- are somewhat inconsistent. I watched the first game of the season between the LA Sparks and some other team, and it was an embarrassment that set the game of bball back 50 years. On the other hand, I've seen WNBA teams trade 3-pt buckets with hands in their faces back and forth, back and forth in a thrilling battle of competitive, high-level talent.
I watch a little NBA, and during this last season saw a lot of reckless, terrible, jack up a shot shooting that resembled street courts in Waterloo more than the World's Best League.
Both leagues have outstanding top-level players which stand head-and-shoulders above the rest of the league, and who are elite, skilled players.
And oh, by the way, CClark's 3pt shots are taken further from the hoop than Steph Curry or any other NBA player. You may not, but some people find that exciting.
Not trying to convert you or anything like that, and much of what you say is true, but by characterizing every WNBA game as a 'literal blooper reel' doesn't reflect reality.