Penn's Leading Scorer Entering Transfer Portal.

MelroseHawkins

Well-Known Member
Ethan Roberts is a 6' 5" wing who led Penn with 17 pts a game and was their most effective player. He's from Chicago area and started at Army, went to Drake but medical redshirted than to Penn. Boy, would that be interesting and funny if Iowa was able to snag him. Illinois & other BIG schools may be in the mix it sounds.

 
Last edited:
Nice find.... Everythings on the table for Ben I'd say. I think winning that game against FL on that stage opened up a lot of options going forward. Going forward is where the rubber will meet the road for him now.

This yr he didn't have many options he brought his Drake and D2 guys with him and thankfully they had eligibility left to do so and that's what we've had. This off season will be where things get interesting. They'll be some major roles that need replaced with Stirtz and Banks. That'll be it if everyone else decides to come back and I hope they do. Correction Hausen will also be gone but it wasn't like he played a huge role. But is that what'll happen?...
 
Last edited:
Ethan Roberts is a 6' 5" wing who led Penn with 17 pts a game and was their most effective player. He's from Chicago area and started at Arm, went to Drake but medical redshirted than to Penn. Boy, would that be interesting and funny if Iowa was able to snag him. Illinois & other BIG schools may be in the mix it sounds.

Who was the coach at Drake? Was that when Devries was there?
 
Nice find.... Everythings on the table for Ben I'd say. I think winning that game against FL on that stage opened up a lot of options going forward. Going forward is where the rubber will meet the road for him now.

This yr he didn't have many options he brought his Drake and D2 guys with him and thankfully they had eligibility left to do so and that's what we've had. This off season will be where things get interesting. They'll be some major roles that need replaced with Stirtz and Banks. That'll be it if everyone else decides to come back and I hope they do. But is that what'll happen?...
Yes, this run in the NCAA is so important & hopefully will pay benefits on the recruiting trail. He got a lot of attention last year with the D2 story and Drake winning a game in the NCAA. This run only validates him more. Good thing!
 
Sounds like they think Banks has a good shot to get another year.

I can't recall numbers, but didn't they have one unused spot this year? If Banks is back, and everyone else returns (big if), I believe they have two spots left to fill?

It'll be interesting who McCollum targets. He looks for a different type of kid.
 
It's obvious that to me that Iowa and Coach Ben are going to want a very specific kind of guy. It's toughness, it's defense, it's versatility, it's coachability. I know that all sounds kind of trite, but it's true.

We're going to go after a very specific kind of player in the portal. And we'll be all the better for it.

Also, thinking about this Nebraska matchup and the storyline with Pryce Sandfort... he's a great player and I do wish we still had him for many reasons. But he's now in a perfect system for him. He would not shine in McCollum's system. Running and gunning and getting lots of shots up, that's now how we play.
 
I think this tournament run will definitely open up some doors. But as with a lot of situations today, a lot who we get will come down to $$. My hope is that this run also opens up some of the big donor's wallets and we have more to work with. It can't hurt.
 
I hope I'm not getting ahead of myself, but I'm thinking Iowa is becoming a basketball school again, for the men's team that is. I'm not feeling as much excitement with the women's team with JJ in charge. Good coach, but not great.
 
I hope I'm not getting ahead of myself, but I'm thinking Iowa is becoming a basketball school again, for the men's team that is. I'm not feeling as much excitement with the women's team with JJ in charge. Good coach, but not great.
Wuuuut?? You trolling or just delirious? One of the more dumber takes I have seen on this board. JJ is a terrific coach. She's had success already and have been bringing in some of the best recruiting classes in Iowa history. This years team is very young and are the foundation of her program.

Just stupid.
 
Wuuuut?? You trolling or just delirious? One of the more dumber takes I have seen on this board. JJ is a terrific coach. She's had success already and have been bringing in some of the best recruiting classes in Iowa history. This years team is very young and are the foundation of her program.

Just stupid.

We don't have to look back too far to see a Bluder team with a similar result. Clark's sophomore year the team played way above expectations, won the B1G tournament, and earned a #2 seed. They then lost in the round of 32 to a #10 Creighton team in a game that seemed like a carbon copy of what we just witnessed vs. Virginia. They weren't tough enough, they didn't have the flexibility to adjust their game plan on the fly, and they simply were not ready for the moment.

How did the team respond? They got tougher, they identified their flaws, they became more flexible in how they could play, and then they went to 2 straight National Title games.

I know it is crazy to think about, but Ava Heiden is another elite talent; not Clark, but in the neighborhood of Gustafson (by the way, Gustafson's team made the NIT when she was a sophomore). This year they had seniors in Stuelke and Feuerbach, and they were great Hawks, but they were not players who could put the team on their back. They relied most heavily on Heiden, but also on fellow sophomores Stremlow and Wright. Their bench was entirely freshman (Houston, Deal, Hayes). Jensen is also in her sophomore season. I think we need to wait until after next season to truly judge Coach Jensen's ability. We certainly didn't write off Bluder and Clark after the Creighton loss, and history showed we shouldn't have.

Bring back your core next year; improve the backcourt and the "stretchiness" of our 4-position through development (Deal and Houston), freshman (Woliczko), and portal (I count Rodriguez here, along with at least 2 rotation players); and let these players and coaches learn from this experience. I expect sweet-16 as the floor of expectations for next year, with upside beyond that. If they don't meet that floor, I think it is reasonable to start asking questions.
 
If Iowa makes the E8 there's gonna be bigger fish available in the pond...

This guy was 2nd-team all-conference in the Ivy league, and he seems like a McCaffery player, not a McCollum player. Does not seem like a needle-mover for a B1G team looking to move up in the conference standings, and he should not be a priority target.
 
We don't have to look back too far to see a Bluder team with a similar result. Clark's sophomore year the team played way above expectations, won the B1G tournament, and earned a #2 seed. They then lost in the round of 32 to a #10 Creighton team in a game that seemed like a carbon copy of what we just witnessed vs. Virginia. They weren't tough enough, they didn't have the flexibility to adjust their game plan on the fly, and they simply were not ready for the moment.

How did the team respond? They got tougher, they identified their flaws, they became more flexible in how they could play, and then they went to 2 straight National Title games.

I know it is crazy to think about, but Ava Heiden is another elite talent; not Clark, but in the neighborhood of Gustafson (by the way, Gustafson's team made the NIT when she was a sophomore). This year they had seniors in Stuelke and Feuerbach, and they were great Hawks, but they were not players who could put the team on their back. They relied most heavily on Heiden, but also on fellow sophomores Stremlow and Wright. Their bench was entirely freshman (Houston, Deal, Hayes). Jensen is also in her sophomore season. I think we need to wait until after next season to truly judge Coach Jensen's ability. We certainly didn't write off Bluder and Clark after the Creighton loss, and history showed we shouldn't have.

Bring back your core next year; improve the backcourt and the "stretchiness" of our 4-position through development (Deal and Houston), freshman (Woliczko), and portal (I count Rodriguez here, along with at least 2 rotation players); and let these players and coaches learn from this experience. I expect sweet-16 as the floor of expectations for next year, with upside beyond that. If they don't meet that floor, I think it is reasonable to start asking questions.
Yes, and we should not forget that prior to Clark, Bluder had pretty average BIG teams who didn't make runs in the NCAA. She had her success with Clark a few years before she retired but was at Iowa for many years.

Also, I think JJ also is the first coach to lead an Iowa women's team to 20+ victories her first year. I think.

That along with the recruiting is why I say she so far is a good coach, opposing what the original post stated. I agree, going forward Sweet 16 and Elite 8 should be the bottom bar and I think JJ has done what it takes with the recruiting and young talent. Cripes, she's had Iowa ranked her first two seasons.
 
Nice find.... Everythings on the table for Ben I'd say. I think winning that game against FL on that stage opened up a lot of options going forward. Going forward is where the rubber will meet the road for him now.

This yr he didn't have many options he brought his Drake and D2 guys with him and thankfully they had eligibility left to do so and that's what we've had. This off season will be where things get interesting. They'll be some major roles that need replaced with Stirtz and Banks. That'll be it if everyone else decides to come back and I hope they do. Correction Hausen will also be gone but it wasn't like he played a huge role. But is that what'll happen?...
IMO, retaining your core every season is going to be HUGE in the new world of NIL. Just having as many guys returning and not flipping over the roster is going to put Iowa in a position to far very well again next year. I bet the attrition at Iowa will be similar to what it was under Fran, light.
 
This guy was 2nd-team all-conference in the Ivy league, and he seems like a McCaffery player, not a McCollum player. Does not seem like a needle-mover for a B1G team looking to move up in the conference standings, and he should not be a priority target.
Agree. I posted not really saying should go after him but found it interesting that he was from the midwest and could potentially be on a regional team, possibly BIG 10.

Ben really needs to look at big 5's to match the other teams in the BIG, IMO.
 
IMO, retaining your core every season is going to be HUGE in the new world of NIL. Just having as many guys returning and not flipping over the roster is going to put Iowa in a position to far very well again next year. I bet the attrition at Iowa will be similar to what it was under Fran, light.
Especially with teams like McCollum's who really put an emphasis on great defense and toughness. I would hate getting a player to that level of playing great defense, having them leave, then have to start over with new players coming in. Such an advantage if they stay and can just build on it. Cooper Koch stayed and he gelled right in and played better defense.
 
Yes, and we should not forget that prior to Clark, Bluder had pretty average BIG teams who didn't make runs in the NCAA. She had her success with Clark a few years before she retired but was at Iowa for many years.

Also, I think JJ also is the first coach to lead an Iowa women's team to 20+ victories her first year. I think.

That along with the recruiting is why I say she so far is a good coach, opposing what the original post stated. I agree, going forward Sweet 16 and Elite 8 should be the bottom bar and I think JJ has done what it takes with the recruiting and young talent. Cripes, she's had Iowa ranked her first two seasons.
Bluder finished in the top 3 in the Big Ten 9 times before Caitlin showed up, which also included 14 NCAA appearances and a run to an elite 8.

JFC.
 
Top