One difference is position. Adjusting as a scoring guard from high school to college is a leap. In high school, she was just light years better than her competition. Shots come easy, and your coach probably told her to shoot it every time. In college, Addie had much better competition and had to play within a system of equally talented players.McKenna in every way seems to be the real deal worthy of her 5-star rating.
But after Addie Deal's disappointing freshman season, I think Iowa fans are a little cautious about rushing out and asking Wolizcko to be All Big Ten on Day 1. Like all freshman, she will make her freshan mistakes this upcoming season.
But knowing all that, she looks really, really good like right now already.
I don't know...I think an opposite argument could also be made.One difference is position. Adjusting as a scoring guard from high school to college is a leap. In high school, she was just light years better than her competition. Shots come easy, and your coach probably told her to shoot it every time. In college, Addie had much better competition and had to play within a system of equally talented players.
Power forward should translate much quicker. McKenna plays hard D, rebounds, and does her damage around the hoop. Those skill should be an easier adjustment to the college level. I have her penciled in to start from Day 1. We'll see.
Yes, the opposite argument can be made. I just don't agree with it here. Hustle, tenacity, rim running, physicality, sticky D, boards. Those things are hard to coach. The player just has them. McKenna apparently does. Those things travel better than outside shooting and offensive skill, IMHO. McKenna will absolutely have growing pains, but I would bet good money she has a much better season than Deal did as a freshman. By a long shot.I don't know...I think an opposite argument could also be made.
As a guard, Deal had multiple open looks from 3 simply because of Iowa's constant threat to throw it inside to a 1st Team BTen Center. Opponent defenses had to sag and overcompensate for Heiden's talent, and Deal actually had it about as easy as any Guard could from that perspective. Deal's struggles weren't because of being short, or lack of speed, or because she was unable to get open looks -- she just shot the ball like crap.
On the other hand, star h.s. Forwards were typically one of the tallest players on the court, and certainly taller and better than anyone guarding them. That won't be the case in BTen play, and a Fr. Forward making the transition will likely have to rely more on their 10-ft shots than close-in layups. McKenna may well be better at making those adjustments than Deal was, but I think the challenges will be significant for her as well.
Turnovers were an issue for Deal; I wouldn't be surprised if McKenna struggles in that area too as she tries to force the ball into Heiden, but we shall see...
Yes, the opposite argument can be made. I just don't agree with it here. Hustle, tenacity, rim running, physicality, sticky D, boards. Those things are hard to coach. The player just has them. McKenna apparently does. Those things travel better than outside shooting and offensive skill, IMHO. McKenna will absolutely have growing pains, but I would bet good money she has a much better season than Deal did as a freshman. By a long shot.
That makes my point better than I did. Comparing Houston and Deal's freshmen years is a great example of how doing all the other stuff well, other than scoring, can lead to a strong freshmen season. And, McKenna is bigger and more athletic than Houston. She plays like Stuelke, but with more ceiling. This team could be really good.I tend to agree with @Grady , but Houston's success this past year supports your argument. Players that can contribute in multiple ways without having to be an offensive fulcrum might have an easier transition.
I think defense is a harder transition for a 4 or a 5 (see Heiden and Hayes), but I think that is an incoming strength for Woliczko, which should help.
That makes my point better than I did. Comparing Houston and Deal's freshmen years is a great example of how doing all the other stuff well, other than scoring, can lead to a strong freshmen season. And, McKenna is bigger and more athletic than Houston. She plays like Stuelke, but with more ceiling. This team could be really good.
Mckenna's gonna get pushed around physically in the B1G. Not due to effort or technique, just due to weight. She'll need to add 10-15#s to be a good 3 or 20+ #s to be a strong 4.High hopes for McKenna, however I'm not sure how big her impact will be her freshman year. Great height, length and mobility, But, she doesn't have the toughness yet. I actually think that Bjorn (Texas) will have a better freshamn year than Woliczko. It will be fun to watch.
Disagree with both of you gents. Would be willing to wager money on a really good Freshman campaign for McKenna. She has been playing some elite level talent in the AllStar circuit and more than holding her own. She also naturally plays the position that clearly is our weakest roster spot at the moment. I believe she will start, but if not, she will play. We shall see,Mckenna's gonna get pushed around physically in the B1G. Not due to effort or technique, just due to weight. She'll need to add 10-15#s to be a good 3 or 20+ #s to be a strong 4.
I'm a huge McKenna fan. She'll have a far better career than Hannah. But she's really thin and B1G 4s and 5s are going to move her off her spots consistently next year. She'll be able to offset it some thought athleticism, hustle and technique. But she'll struggle some too.Disagree with both of you gents. Would be willing to wager money on a really good Freshman campaign for McKenna. She has been playing some elite level talent in the AllStar circuit and more than holding her own. She also naturally plays the position that clearly is our weakest roster spot at the moment. I believe she will start, but if not, she will play. We shall see,