NorthKCHawk
Well-Known Member
And most wealthy people, I mean really wealthy people, are easily getting 10-20% growth on their wealth through passive and active investments with much lower tax consequences than we worker bees have to pay, percentage wise. So, giving .4% is barely scratching the revenue stream for someone who already has more money than they can ever spend.They don't see it as an investment. They see it as a hobby just like people who throw $100 down on Draft Kings every weekend.
1) It's a big dick competition if you want to be "the man" when you walk in the room.
2) It's just not big money to most of these guys.
Cody Campbell's net worth isn't public because all of his wealth is in private companies, but most places I've seen estimate him at $5 billion. If he gives $25 million a year, that's .4% of his net worth. Point 4 percent.
To put it in perspective let's take someone with a $2 million net worth when you look at their savings, retirement accounts, and equity in their home, etc. Not very uncommon at all. I'd say for a married couple in their late 50s who've had decent jobs, saved for retirement, and have most of their mortgage paid off $2 million in net worth isn't a stretch between two people.
That same donation would be $8,000 per year. I know TONS of people who spend way more than that on Hawkeye sports every year when you consider tickets, travel, bowl games, tailgating, etc. And those people are just burning that money because they get nothing back other than recreational enjoyment...it's not an investment whatsoever.
Its the same principle as the Saudis and LIV golf. They have literally lost a billion dollars on the endeavor, but they don't care because the whole point was to just make themselves look less douschy to the Western World. To make them seem more acceptable to countries they want to partner with. The loss itself is a quarterly rounding error. Barely a blip. The 1/10 of 1% have just stupid money in their possession.